Phraseologism, the value of which can be defined as “Create a false picture of yourself by exposing yourself, your position is better than it really is; deceive". It is felt that this is an disapproving expression and that you need to be on the alert with it.
And indeed, it is not as simple as it seems. And this follows not only from its significance. It consists of two phrases: dust and dust in the eyes. And if we consider them separately, both convey the meaning that is embedded in phraseological unit as a whole. The first, however, does not indicate exactly where the dust comes in. But "Let dust", even around you It is perceived precisely as an impression incomprehensible, ambiguous and, possibly, false.
The one who does not consoles because he does not want. The one who raptures himself will be humbled, and the one who humbles himself will be exalted. He who has ears, let him hear. A saying that is not specifically predicted is nonsense, that sentence. Proud are dying and humble.
The sun rises for all: saints and bastards, wise and stupid. In the blacksmith's house a wooden knife. In the next eye we see a straw, like a mill beam. Less than a crow. Every meeting must have Judas. Among the twelve apostles was Judas.
Do what we say, not what we do. The fulfillment of the evil that is being done to you is not a sin, but paid. It is necessary to preach by example. Good, and don’t look who. The great thing is to give who comes to sue. The flesh is weak, but the experienced devil.
Now let's go separately according to the words:
Let - note that it is not the usual mechanical action like “throwing” or “throwing”, but a deeper one. "Let" is associated more with permission to something. Just adding the prefix, we get a very clear "let in".
Dust - On the one hand, who is not familiar with these small gray particles, which with all their looks ask to remove them, and then come back again and again? And associations with them are exceptionally bad and unclean. But, on the other hand, one can recall the library dust, dusty books. There, the same dust is rather disposed to itself and inspires respect for the age of what it covers.
In the eyes - so that the main thing - it was not visible what was happening. All other sensory organs are fully functioning, and it cannot be said that a person does not understand what is happening at all. No, he just does not see what is happening or sees far from everything.
The meat is weak. Faith does not save me with a boat stick. Rake said to the raven: Turn away that you are very black! The honor of the proud in dishonor does very much. The pan said to the pan: "Turn away from me!" Careful deception deceives inexperience. Weinglori flourishes, but does not increase.
Appearances are deceptive: with the face of a thing, they are something else. Prayer and prayer under the apron. Grapes and the sun, for good and for a bad God made them. Wash your hands like Pilate. Crying like Magdalena. Caesar, give it to Caesar and God from God. No matter what the right hand does, it is sinister.
That is, it is immediately clear that the action is targeted. And it is directed so that for a moment (they will not let dust for hours - the whole focus will lose its meaning) to deprive a person of the opportunity to see the full picture of what is happening.
All versions of the origin come down to about the same thought.
So, several versions origin
phraseologism:
Friends of my friends, my friends. The epistles are small gospels. Sayings are compressed parables. Old sayings are small gospels. Old sayings are prophecies. The last will be the first. Evil preaches that barely live. Easier to advise than recommended.
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God. Doctor, heal yourself. Many are called, but few are selected. No one is a prophet in his own land. No one can fulfill if two masters are to serve. The shortest way is no better.
1) Borrowing from other languages. A similar expression is found in many European languages. And there, accordingly, it is rooted in the Latin language, recalling that during the battle, gladiators dusted the arena from the arena into the eyes of the enemy in order to blind him for some time.
2) A specific historical case. Litigation in Moscow in the XVI century. between Lithuanian and Russian. The Lithuanian then cheated and threw a pinch of sand into the slot to take the enemy, blinding him. Thanks to what he won. And since then, the Russians have adopted both the combat technique and the turnover.
All that glitters is not gold, but the flour is all that whitens. No deaf than he who does not hear. Do not hurt or kill not cowardice, but natural. You cannot serve two gentlemen at the same time and you are all happy. It is not always a good idea to follow the path.
Not always the one who saves, uses. Not only bread lives by man. A land juggler never plays well. Or serve as a servant or run like a deer. Eye for eye and tooth for tooth. Another rooster will sing if good advice. Pay for the shot with a shot, and a stick with a stick.
Give advice, all; take it, little. To see and not to be, often happens. The premise of the right cheek. Honestly, they will haunt you. The fish dies from the mouth, and the man by the word. For the sample, the fabric is known. In order not to feed the devil, an honorable person must suffer.
3) The version is associated with a dusty curtain that was created by passing troops or chariots at the Olympics: the dust covered the eyes of those who followed them and prevented them from looking forward. And the Russians have a similar version of the version: while carts with peasant luggage slowly ran along the roads of Russia, from time to time in dust clubs the crew swiftly rushed past them - the departure of a wealthy landowner or a chaise of a foreign ambassador. Looking after them, the poor stood for a long time and wiped their dusty eyes.
A faithful father who enters one ear, and for the other comes me. A desert sermon would be a big mistake. He who calls God finds God. He who serves the two masters must lie. He who loves the danger in him will perish. Who plays with fire, burns his fingers.
Whoever puts the cane, take the lagoon. Who paid for it. Whoever wants to hear it, let them hear it. One who is not against us is in our favor. Who asks to give is obliged. Whoever preaches in the desert loses the sermon. Who preaches in the desert, his words are carried away by the wind.
4) Finally, the last, mystical version. It is associated with sorcerers and witches who like to appear in front of people in a fog or cloud of dust - to enhance the effect and unpredictability of what is happening.
As you can see, the versions are not far from the value itself. Indeed, deceived or embellished. Really - dust. Or sand.
Whoever they go on, go on. Who lies with the children, pisses, gets up. One who praises himself desalaba. Whoever has a friend has a treasure. Those who sow the winds will gather storms. Inherited Statements, Abridged Gospels. Reproach the lives of others with your example, not your understanding.
Health and pesetas, the rest sucks. San Cercano does not work miracles; San Lejares, tens and hundreds. The saint was Peter and denied his master. Sowing weeds. If God wants to. He always did what God wanted. On a bad and good appearance, the sun is in the sky.
This is all who are, but not all who are. Throw a stone and hide your hand. After the cloud sets in the sun, and after bad weather is even better. After the storm comes calm. After the storm comes a bonza. Talk to the sea, not enter it. Pipe charity, vanity and no mercy.
Let us return to the same two phrases and consider them in more detail.
Blow dust - two full-valued words connected by the magic of submission. The main thing is to let it go, the addict is dust. The spell by which the word "let" tied the word "dust" to itself looks like this: what?. And with any changes to the main word "dust" will remain in the form of an accusative case.
Let (what?) Dust, let (what?) Dust, let (what?) Dust.
So dominates here magic of control.
One and two, one of two. Human vanity, conceited pomp: today smoke and dust. We see the chaff in the eyes of another, and we do not see the ray in ours. He beats good well. Hypocrisy, lies, disloyalty. Repentance, repentance, pain. Hypocrisy, neglect, criticism.
Miguel de Cervantes told the mouth of Don Quixote that "the statement does not come on purpose, but it’s stupid to sentence." Hence the importance of understanding their meaning. The famous poem by Antonio Machado, which shows the sad phenomenon of "two spines." He points out that the use of idioms and expressions is lost in the younger generations, and that our society is becoming increasingly de-Christianized; nevertheless, he emphasizes that the idiosyncrasy of our language by its need to express itself on the basis of images inherited from the eastern world, so different from its current social context, may have been preserved with more attention than other peoples, by religious type paremiology.
Dust in the eyes - also full words associated with the magic of submission. The main thing is "dust", the addict is "into the eyes." The connection is made by the spell where to?. And, similar to the previous phrase, the dependent word is invariable, no matter how the main behavior.
Dust (where?) In the eyes, dust (where?) In the eyes
It also does its magic here. control.
Gregorio Doval, Spanish Themed Refranro, ed. The Old Testament would have made it possible to do a much broader and more ambitious work, since in the various scriptures included in it, there are many expressions and phrases that also gave rise to the corresponding phraseological expressions. For example, we quote famous people such as “He who has a friend has a treasure”, “Man offers, but God disposes” and “Eye for eye, tooth by tooth”.
Biblical quotes were extracted from a Bible book by the Editorial Herder in Barcelona. They are written verbatim and in alphabetical order. Subsequently, other phraseological expressions that are derived from it, as well as what meanings are attributed to them, are indicated.
Phraseologism is always one integral member of a sentence, therefore:
If we consider the full form, then - the predicate.
I think that he is just (what is he doing?) Dusting our eyes.
The dusting part is also a predicate.
(What did he do?) Dusted around this affair.
But the "dust in the eye" part is itself an addition.
Let's do without (what?) Dust in the eyes.
This proverb, like many others, has its origin in a popular fairy tale, where a pilgrim who went to the Holy Land ordered him to bring a piece of Cresis larva, but he actually brought a piece of wood, which he found on the way back. The devotion to the relic caused illness to heal, and then the con man said: “This is the intention to heal, not the boat’s stick.” He collected Maxim Chevalier in a traditional fairy tale, culture, literature, ed. Chevalier for a Spanish folk tale. In this case, the man advises his servant to never stray from the road, avoiding short cuts, and this saves him from getting into an ambush of bandits.
“Dust in the eyes” can replace phraseologism in its entirety, without losing its meaning, but “let the dust out” can only be considered as an indirect analogue, since dust can be released in any way and anywhere, not necessarily in the eye. Namely, the distortion of visual perception is meant in phraseological unit as a whole.
The language is most often found in full form. "Blowing dust" is used less frequently and, most often, in a slightly different sense. And "dust in the eyes" can be found either with a similar meaning "let the verb", or in itself, but very rarely.
Espinoza, Popular Stories of Spain, Ed. The connection between the two seems more and more obvious to me: one depends on the other, and the absence of one puts the other at risk. Well-known African-American activist Martin Luther King in his famous sermon against the war in Vietnam quoted from the Bible: Those who live with lies live in spiritual slavery. Freedom is still the prize we receive for knowing the truth. Jesus said, “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
Thanks to this moralizing tale, the baby Don Juan Manuel, in the fourteenth century, can perfectly explain the meaning of the aforementioned paremia. He also points out: “Cry more than Magdalena”, “Be Maddalen” and “Looking like Magdalena”. Rand, Bible Dictionary, Ed.
About used given phraseology you don’t have to say very much, because in modern colloquial speech it is rather rare to find such an expression. It’s much easier to say the slang “brainwash” or “fool me” instead of “dust in the eyes”. The meanings of the expressions are not exactly the same, but the modern world often does not think about what it says.
It is interesting to note that this proverb appears only in the Gospel of Luke, and by the way, one way or another, Luke the Evangelist, a student of Paul Tarsus, had a medical profession. Its appearance is similar to wheat and is considered a weed for crops growing on crops and roadsides. He also appears in the Old Testament: Deuteronomy 8.
He was modern with Jesus, and his moral doctrines are similar to those revealed in the Bible, which gave rise to speculations about his possible conversion to Christianity and his relationship with St. Paul. Compiled by various compilers, such as Pascual Morote in Jumilla, Sanchez Ferrat in several locations in Murcia or Julio Camarena in Ciudad Real.
They like to use this phraseology in journalism, especially on the topic of politics. Here and there are articles that a certain Mr. N is only engaged in the fact that he puts dust in our eyes. And then a certain Mr. N writes about these articles that, on the contrary, they blow dust in his eyes and so on in a circle. But in the end, only dust and no information.
They are on our side, or they are on the side of the terrorists. We can read it in Don Quixote, like many other sayings. He points out that Barabbas was rather the leader of the resistance to the Roman occupation, the political messiah. The Jewish people had to choose between two forms of opposing messianism: led by Barabbas and the preaching of Jesus.
Compilation in alphabetical order of more than 200 phraseological expressions that appear throughout this work. The destination number that appears in the correspondence article is shown in parentheses. Men and women working at construction sites are in everyday danger. This is especially true when working with corrosive materials such as cement powder. Eyes are particularly vulnerable to exposure to corrosive materials, and although eye injuries can be horrific, regular follow-up care is required.
Less commonly used is this expression in fiction. They treat him there more carefully and use only, indeed, in the case.
And finally, it is interesting to note that a performance with a name of the same name with our phraseological unit is underway in the Kazan Theater. The author of the play: Eugene Labisch. A play about the love of two people whose relationship is partially built for them by their parents. And with this name, the main idea of \u200b\u200bthe work is immediately clearly traced.
If particles or cement dust get into your eyes, attention and prompt treatment can prevent damage or blindness. Remove excess particles from the face and wash your hands. This can be done using an eye wash station, if available; sterile saline or running tap water. Be sure to keep your eyes as open as possible.
Call your local emergency number or ask someone to take you to the ward emergency care hospital or ophthalmologist. Remove contact lenses if you are using them after the first rinse. If it is very painful, keep the lenses in the eye for an otolimologist to remove them.
Errisa, 1st year student of Argemona University, Pilvilnin House
Blowing Dust - Phraseological Dictionary - Winged Expressions - Cut Off.
By any actions create a false (usually best) impression of yourself.
Rinse your eyes until you receive medical attention. Follow all instructions given by an ophthalmologist for post-treatment treatment. Cement is corrosive and can cause serious damage, sometimes permanent and even blindness, if not handled properly.
Rubbing the eyes can exacerbate any damage caused by cement powder. Do not use eye rinse for rinsing. Always wear safety glasses when working near cement and other aggressive materials. Failure to contact an ophthalmologist after exposure to powdery cement may result in eye damage or blindness.
decomp., disapproved. with noun with value faces
owls let the master, worker, student ... let
usually a tale. Liu, an engineer ...
saying, a flaw: in dealing with people, he tried to throw dust in their eyes. Once, climbing caves and finding crystals in them, he learned all the names of the amino acids contained in them for the sole purpose of hypnotizing and tormenting his interlocutor with obscure terms
Turnover pull the wool over someone's eyes has the meaning:
“Create a false picture of yourself,
exposing oneself, one’s position is better than it is on
in fact; deceive". In the dictionaries next to this
the turnover is a litter: “disapproving”,
it is an evaluation expression. Blow dust in
eyes - definitely bad, don't do it -
it means to be honest.
We will not deny ourselves the pleasure of quoting
“Punch calling” by Denis Davydov:
Petrov-Vodkin Kuzma Sergeevich
Hlynovsk (1930) (Chapter Ten. OKHTA - EMPTY STREET): "The Admiralty is one thing worth it. You see, I really wanted to trade with the Swedes, Europe dust upand look for a Swede and Europe in the swamps ... "
Zoshchenko M.M.
In front of my eyes - very fast
For eyes - in the absence of someone to talk about him
You will not have time to blink an eye - quickly
our cars. in interior filters help the passenger compartment, so the quality of the filters used is very important in, soot, pollen, toxic chemicals, exhaust gases, and odor neutralization dust exhaust cabin, inProtect car owners from getting en
Every good and wonderful phenomenon has its reflection in a mirror, in which everything is the other way around. This principle of duality, this is through the looking glass and the original itself, they stand side by side, against each other, and there is a struggle. But initially, the law of duality should have worked in a completely different way. It is time to change yourself, and all biomachines become Humans. The law of the looking glass disappears, illusions dissolve, shadows disappear at noon. And noon is near, and this is the greatest holiday for Man and God.
In biomachines there is no gene memory that is inherent in Man. But they also improve, only very slowly, and only through the so-called operators, or in the biblical language - the shepherds.
Most operators already understand that they need to descend to the Man, to the birthright, and bring their herds of machines to the Man, so that the man can reformat these machines so that he can give them a gene set of words - keys that are owned by the original man walking from the original sources and remembering his ancestors.
Truth has always lived and will live in Man. And nowhere does she live separately for a long time. There may be a thought, a feeling, like a moment of truth, but the Truth itself comes from a person. And such a person is different from the rest in that his thought coincides with his word and his deeds. And no matter how, hordes of space alien troops, carrying the seizure of the earth and the search for energy, did not go against man, they are all nothing compared to Man.
Remember Diogenes, when he came out of his barrel, in the afternoon with the fire of his soul he was looking for a man like himself. Seek the Man.
A man alone can cope with any invasions, and even if they constantly wash him, remove him from various corners of the earth, like Prometheus throw him into oblivion, Man will resurrect, like a Phoenix bird from oblivion, dissolve any cosmic dust that is thrown into his face alien biomachines, and manifest the Truth of Being in any place wherever it appears. A person, if they deceive him, and slip a lie to him instead of the truth, he, by the purity of his thought, can turn any lie into the Truth and neutralize the lie. Next to Man, the processes of decay cease, and his Fire of the soul begets life in any desert. Such is Man, and his greatness, his crown - the King of kings, the Master of planets and stars, the Creator and Friend of God.
Quite often, people in everyday speech use, instead of the steady expression "splurge" synonym phraseological units. For example: "powder the brain", "fool your head."
By analyzing the two statements mentioned, we can better understand the essence of their prototype, which is the subject of this article. It is significant that both of these stable expressions are derived from the original “splurge”. At the same time, they got the opportunity of independent existence due to a more specific coverage of the mother phraseological unit that generated them.
A year and a half ago, an article on the decline of Russian artillery appeared in the Military-Industrial Courier with a very characteristic headline: "They are either 10 years behind or forever behind." The authors noted a catastrophic lag in domestic developments in the field of reconnaissance and information support for artillery and fire control automation systems. The experts’s summary is tough: the state of Russian artillery "does not meet the requirements of modern military operations." The time for preparing the data for firing remained at the level of the First World War, and the communication and data transmission system from the command and observation post to the firing positions remained at the level of the Second World War. What can I say if the main navigator of the Russian Armed Forces remains a top-loader designed in the 40s of the last century: it is part of all the main missile-artillery and anti-aircraft missile systems (SAM) - the Smerch multiple-launch rocket system, S-SAM -300 different modifications. A topo-loader is included in the factory equipment of the toggler: in fact, this is a variant of the odograph - a track sensor, also known ... to the ancient Greeks and Romans.
After the ball"
Of course, there was no know-how in the parade on May 9, 2015. In the sense that it is an ancient Soviet tradition - to splurge, showing under the guise of new products dummies, props or, at best, piece copies of "handmade". You can recall that the very idea of \u200b\u200bsuch parades with a massive demonstration of technical power actually belongs to Hitler.
The parades on any occasion inspired the Germans, awakening in them the militaristic spirit and pride in the revived army, at the same time it was the Führer’s personal triumph and a clear demonstration of the successes of the Third Reich military industry. This idea was captured by Stalin - he also needed to show the success of industrialization and triumphantly note the consolidation of personal power.
How does he manipulate you. Scripts before marriage
Love for love leads ... to divorce
How to attract a man?
